Gerry Mulligan And Chet Baker – Two Cool Cats
When it comes to the beginnings of west coast jazz (cool jazz, if you prefer), there was probably no more influential pairing than Gerry Mulligan and Chet Baker. Their short-lived quartet gave the jazz world of the early 1950’s an exit ramp from an increasingly hard and edgy bebop scene, where listeners could refresh with music that was like a warm breeze and a cool drink. Even all these decades later it has that same effect.
The world of classic jazz consists of two kinds of players – The first (and most common) are those players who are known purely on their own merit. They may go through periods or a series of ad-hoc associations, but when you name a name – let’s go with Coleman Hawkins or Louis Armstrong as examples – your first thought is of a long series of great performances by that artist. The second are players who almost always make you think of a second player, because together, the two make for the kind of pairing that to name only one seems incomplete.
We have dealt with several of that second kind here. Early examples are Joe Venuti & Eddie Lang, as well as Bix Beiderbecke & Frank Trumbauer, from the pre-swing era of the late 1920’s. Later versions of this Laurel & Hardy syndrome are Dizzy Gillespie and Charlie Parker from the early days of bebop in the second half of the 1940s. Well, today we have another such pairing – Gerry Mulligan and Chet Baker from the early 1950’s and the flowering of cool jazz.
We previously touched on Gerry Mulligan who, as a fresh-faced kid, became part of Miles Davis’ 1949-50 nonet. Mulligan’s family moved frequently due to his father’s job but he managed to wring a lot of musical ability out of his high school years when he began to both play and write arrangements for established bands. After writing for several big bands (such as that of Claude Thornhill) it was Mulligan’s writing that got him an invitation to Miles’ Davis’ select group of 1949-50, which would become remembered as a pioneer of the cool jazz or west coast jazz movement of the early 1950’s. And it is hard to forget a tall, lanky redhead playing a baritone sax in the jazz world of that time.
After the Davis group packed it in, Mulligan began a gig writing arrangements for Stan Kenton and performing informally in a New York club called The Hague. It was there that he met a young trumpet player named Chesley (Chet) Baker.
Baker was much less formed as a musician than was Mulligan and played largely by ear, but the two of them soon began playing regularly together. When the piano was taken out of the club to accommodate a new headline act, the two decided on the unusual form of a quartet with no piano, just Mulligan and Baker backed by a bass and drums (Bob Whitlock and the versatile Chico Hamilton). With the two horns doing 100% of the actual music (although I may get some bass and drum players upset by this characterization) the two had their hands full without a piano to help set the chords. But as you will see, they managed quite nicely.
Baker had been in a group led by Charlie Parker for a short time around 1951-52, but found in Mulligan the polar stylistic opposite of Parker. Parker was an acrobat on his alto saxophone and played frenetic rips and runs where a thousand notes somehow worked themselves out just the way they were supposed to. Mulligan’s style was more of an old-school lyricism that was as reminiscent of the great Lester Young as it was of anyone. Baker, as it turns out, had a style that meshed almost perfectly with that of his new bandmate. The two developed a style in which each weaved around the other in a way that almost anticipated where the other would go in his playing. Mulligan later said that he never had that kind of musical fit with anyone else during his long career.
We have two samples of the Gerry Mulligan Quartet to give you a feel for what they were about. Both of these selections were on the group’s debut record, a ten inch LP that was recorded between August and October of 1952 and released later that year by the Pacific Jazz label. This record, incidentally, came very early in the era when magnetic tape replaced individually cut discs as a recording medium. In fact, not every selection was recorded in an actual studio. Some (including our second sample) were actually recorded in the producer’s home – such was the miracle of the newfangled reel-to-reel tape recorder.
The first is a Mulligan composition called Walkin’ Shoes. Mulligan may be the player most associated with the use of a baritone saxophone in jazz. I personally cannot get enough baritone sax in my life, so almost anything by Gerry Mulligan scratches me where I itch. Much of the theme for this track is the then-common way of the saxophone and trumpet playing in unison but Mulligan’s instrument gives that sound a unique flavor. And note how every little slide or bend in a note is played as one, to the point where it is sometimes difficult for listeners to separate the two instruments. The pace is relaxed and nobody is in a hurry, but the song has always seemed to me much shorter than its 3:13 on the clock. I guess time flies when you’re having fun. We must not ignore Baker’s mellow trumpet, which was so different from the hard-charging young players in New York at that time.
Next up is another of the groups most famous recordings, Bernie’s Tune. It is here that the tempo gets a little faster and the solos become the featured attraction. Listen to the way the two horn players riff in a kind of counterpoint with one another, all because the two “got” each other in a way that rarely happens. Unfortunately, the magic would not last.
In what may have been one of the most momentous arrests in history, Mulligan was nabbed on a drug charge in 1953 and spent almost a year on the “Sheriff’s Honor Farm”. Baker, left at loose ends, put together his own group, which parlayed his soft, gentle horn, his even gentler voice and his Hollywood good looks into a solo career that blossomed for the next several years. After his release, Mulligan tried to re-assemble the quartet. But Baker’s newfound stardom (however temporary) made the old arrangement impractical, causing him to turn down a re-unification.
Mulligan went on to a long career of small groups, the occasional big band, and even some orchestral work in addition to his always-good musical writing. He eventually kicked his drug habit and continued to perform until his death in 1996 at the age of 68, following complications from a knee surgery – which got him out of the suffering that would have gone along with the liver cancer which had also gotten ahold of him.
Baker’s later career was not as rosy. His heroine addiction became a lifelong problem which made for a scattered and messy life, including getting some teeth broken during a beating he suffered in the mid 1960’s – one which hurt his ability to pay trumpet until he was forced to develop a new technique following being fitted for dentures. In 1988 Baker was found dead on a sidewalk below the window of an Amsterdam hotel room that contained heroine and cocaine, making one more name on that long list of jazzmen whose lives were ruined by substance abuse. He was 58 years old.
Maybe these guys are only half of one of those ham & eggs sets of players because each had long careers that did not involve the other. But like another pairing of Lester Young and Billie Holiday from fifteen years earlier, everybody who listens to Mulligan or Baker will soon end up right back here in that brief period where each player seemed to complete the other in a way that begs you to listen again and again. Soooo, pardon me while I go do just that.
Both musical selections from the YouTube page for Gerry Mulligan as supplied by Universal Music Group
All photos are from commercially sold album cover art or from promotional photographs without copyright markings and thus subject to non-commercial and educational use.
I listened to “Bernie’s Tune” and suddenly realized I was toe-tapping and hip-swaying along with the music. Hard to sit still with that one. As always JP, a fascinating account of the lives of musicians, and an education in a jazz genre I wasn’t familiar with. What a tragic ending to the story though; did not see either demise coming. At least their catchy instrumentals live on.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think you hit on the fact that these guys played music that was extremely listenable. Some jazz does not really appeal to the casual listener, but the stuff from this group is really approachable.
Nice entry on two guys who embodied the “West Coast Cool School” of Jazz. Not that long ago, a bunch of us were commenting on Mulligans righteous “forward combed” buzz cut, a real statement in the day! Lots of proponents of the “dry martini” aspect of the form, and as you state, it was really listenable for the average person after jazz became fragmented and less popular.
Poor Chet Baker has always taken it on the chin from hard core jazz-o-philes, he was not considered a good or experimental player, BUT, you can’t deny the mellow sound! I’ve been listening to “Chet in Paris” for years! I think most hard core jazz people dissed him for the “sweet lost boy” looks, and considered most of his following back in the day to be “looks influenced” women, but again, you’ve got to have something to clean the palate after “hard bop”, or Ornette Coleman!
Two things: Chet Baker had somewhat of a resurgence in the 80’s, culminated by the release of “docu-fantasy” film “Let’s Get Lost” by famed fashion photographer Bruce Weber. I consider the film to be a beautiful and interesting take on Chet, by a known style-maker, altho flawed by the useless interaction with Bruce’s gang of models, who probably couldn’t know less about jazz. I had the great joy of living in Chicago at the time, and seeing it on the big screen at the Fine Arts theater downtown. It was unavailable for years, due to a fight with the family over residuals, but may be available again (be careful if you’re searching for this, used, there are a lot of “euro” versions available, but not watchable on U.S. vid standards).
Next, I also had the great joy of meeting William Claxton, famed fashion and jazz photographer, during a showing of his work in Chicago in the late 90’s, unfortunately, only about 10 years before his passing. At the time, I purchased a quad-tone black and white print of a Chet Baker image of his, and was able to have him sign it while chatting with him. He has a nice selection of really personal Chet Baker pics, taken mostly because, as he told me, he and Chet were similar ages and hung out together for a while. Always worth a look-see!
LikeLiked by 1 person
What great additional background on Chet – thank you! I got an album of his on CD about ten years ago – I don’t even recall which one. I had been familiar with his work with Mulligan, but this was my first exposure to Chet on his own – you are right about that mellow sound, which combined with his singing has an almost haunting quality.
I have not seen Lets Get Lost, but did see the biopic from a few years ago that starred Ethan Hawke. It was not bad, though not of the level of the one Clint Eastwood did on Charlie Parker quite a number of years ago.
I did see the Charlie Parker film and found it enjoyable, and also recommend the Don Cheadle/Miles Davis film of 2015, Miles Ahead, another good film but “loose with the facts”. More of a “docu-fiction”.
My local PBS station was running Ken Burns Jazz doc last month on Saturdays, great for hanging around and watching on a cold day. One of the interesting aspects about that series is the section that talks about how popular jazz was prior to the fifties, but post WWII, the majority of music lovers got into rhythm and blues and rock and roll, partially because of the death of traveling big bands due to expense, and changing tastes. Small jazz combos and individuals went off on tangents like hard bop, “free jazz”, and experimental. Caught in this mess was Chet Baker, whose “smooth” delivery and ballad style, was ridiculed by a lot of the “serious” players, but quite popular with the general public! Popular enough to win some Down Beat polls for best trumpet. I hesitate to say this, but he was like the Kenny G of his era, which is inaccurate for both Chet and Kenny, but probably sociologically correct!
It’s no mystery to explain Chet’s resurgence in the 80’s, with the rise of “Smooth Jazz” radio stations, he was slotted right in! I like a lot of different jazz, so don’t consider “Smooth Jazz” a diss, or even the fabulous Joni Mitchell playing with her collection of jazz sidemen! All good! Those of us that were living in Chicago in the late 80’s, still talk about the great Smooth Jazz radio station WNUA, and their beloved DJ Danae Alexander and her “Lights Out Chicago” evening program, still miss it, and nothing exists like that today!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I must confess I would never have associated Chet Baker with Kenny G, but I can kind of see the logic.
Yes, the death of jazz as a mainstream form of music was a long, slow process. Recording strikes, a war, union scales, and young people involved in a baby boom and staying home instead of going dancing were all factors. I think maybe my least favorite era of popular music is 1950-54 when, with few exceptions, the records that were selling were just awful. I have long said that something new had to come along by the early 50s because pop music had lost every ounce of creativity and vitality by 1950 or so. The field was wide open for rock and roll. Guys like Baker were one of the very few bright spots, and even he didn’t get more than niche popularity.
BTW, just got an e-mail blast from the Jazz Kitchen in Indianapolis on upcoming events. They’re running a Mulligan & Baker Tribute show on April 23rd, two show times! I’d go if I still lived there, but that’s serendipitous, based on your blog entry!
LikeLiked by 1 person