Artie Shaw – So Easy. Except When It Isn’t

So easy Artie_Shaw_Gottlieb_07771_cropped

How many jazz records have we featured from 1949?  And how many times have I made the point of how fractured jazz had become, heading in multiple new directions at once.  Here is another of those directions – one that took the “normal” big band and put it on a course that would be followed by many others over the next thirty years.  But one that was a commercial failure for Shaw when he tried the sound in 1949.

Artie Shaw would surely be included in almost any list of “The Top Ten Big Bands Of The Swing Era”.  As a clarinet player, he was in the thick of the group who found themselves as part of the New York jazz scene of the late 1920’s and by 1935 was one of many of that cohort who was leading his own band.

But Artie Shaw (born Arthur Arshawski of parents who were Jewish immigrants from Europe) was never wired the same as other bandleaders.  Where most were content to find a winning style and stick with it, Shaw was restless.  There was never so much as “an Artie Shaw band” as there was a series of Artie Shaw bands – I count three distinct groups even before the Second World War.  He would start a band, find success, get fed up with what that success brought, and disband.  Rinse and repeat.

So Easy Artie_Shaw_and_the_Rangers

Shaw led a band for the U.S. Navy during wartime, playing in far-off venues in the Pacific theater, often closer to the front lines than was prudent.  He started a new civilian band in 1945 – a very good one, but one which was (true to form) gone by 1946.  Shaw did a little of this, a little of that, and by 1949 found himself a little broke.

Shaw had made a vow to never again lead another dance band.  His idea of hell was having to play the big hit Stardust night after night, and he had spent early 1949 dabbling in classical music.  However, a combination of tax debt and the bills from one of his many divorces (he was married eight times) led him to form what he once called his “fast-money band.”  For a product of financial desperation, this band was a lot better than it should have been.  Late that summer, Shaw hired a group of young musicians, hired some top modern arrangers and went on the road for a few months so that things could come together.  Then in late December he went into the recording studio for a blitz of recordings, which was where the big money was.


These were not the normal “sell them at retail” recordings, but something called radio transcriptions.  These transcriptions were 16 inch discs (a 4 inch diameter increase over the LP that was the norm by the mid 1950’s) which played at 33 1/3 rpm, making them good for fifteen minutes of material on a side.  There were several companies that, beginning in the 1930s, recorded these discs for the broadcast trade via a subscription model.

So Easy Ad_Transcriptions_Capitol_3

Those transcriptions provided inexpensive programming for smaller stations as well as music that was free from the legal hassles while the musicians’ unions, the broadcast industry and the recording industry duked it out for the rights to play records over the air.  And if you ever wondered how some of those old radio shows survived to now, it is because they were recorded on transcriptions.

The fifty tracks recorded for the RCA Thesaurus transcription service from the days around Christmas of 1949 through January 6, 1950 represent the total recorded output of this band, which Shaw closed down shortly after the last recordings were cut.

So Easy album cover

Shaw later said that if the band had made any impressions on audiences, he would have kept it going.  But night after night during his tour, Shaw was trying to find a lane where none apparently existed.  His fans wanted his old stuff.  Listeners into more modern sounds had migrated from the big bands to the small bebop groups that were everywhere at the time.  This band, which sounds now like a great blend of both danceability and musical innovation, was simply a retail flop in 1949.  Shaw once noted wryly “everybody loved it but the audience.”

So Easy - Tadd Dameron

This particular cut, So Easy, was recorded in the earlier part of that session, certainly before December 28, 1949.  Tadd Dameron was one of those modern arrangers hired by Shaw and who wrote the piece we feature today.  Dameron is quite obscure to the general public, but was writing for “anyone who was anyone” in the late 1940s, from Count Basie to Dizzy Gillespie to Sarah Vaughan.  He was one of those writers, arrangers and players (piano, in his case) held in universally high esteem by those in the jazz world of the 1940’s and 50’s, at least before a narcotics addiction got the better of him.

So Easy Al Cohn

The group was stacked with first rate young solo talent.  Tenor sax soloist Al Cohn had clearly soaked up a lot of Lester Young in his youth, offering a sound very much like the tenor great. And Shaw’s clarinet sound had evolved by the time of this band, less shrill than his earlier work, with a more mellow, full-bodied sound and possessing very little vibrato.

To me the noteworthy thing about this record is that it points the way to how just about every big jazz band sounded for the next thirty or more years.  For those old enough to remember watching Johnny Carson’s Tonight Show in the mid 1970’s, can’t you imagine something just like this coming from Doc Severinsen’s NBC Tonight Show Orchestra at the end of the show or during one of those “more to come” breaks?  And Count Basie sold a lot of records into the 1960’s with a sound very much like this band’s.

The key was that the band didn’t just do musical versions of melodies, whether well known or otherwise – as had been the case in most of popular jazz.  This band worked up arrangements that began with a bebop-style theme but, instead of going into a series of frenetic solos as most bop music did, the whole structure was supported by a series of intricately written ensemble passages with some fairly traditional solos out in front of it.

I suppose the closest comparison to Artie Shaw might be Stan Kenton, although Shaw’s tastes were much more restrained (and led to much wider popularity) than the more adventurous Kenton.  Shaw certainly jumped styles as frequently as Kenton did – until he just stopped.  Shaw recorded a handful of tracks with a new small group in 1954 but they were not released until decades later.  Artie put down his clarinet and never picked it up again.  This despite living to the age of 96 by the time he died in 2004, perhaps the last notable representative of his musical era.

Oddly, Artie Shaw even fronted a new band in the 1980’s.  He made the musical choices, he hired the personnel, he even stood on stage and directed it.  But he would not play a single note because, in his mind, he could not possibly measure up to the standard he expected of himself after such a long layoff.  Shaw seemed to combine the incompatible: The artist’s desire to reach for something new and the showman’s need for audience approval.  Is this the perfect recipe for lifelong unhappiness?

If you say “Artie Shaw” today, everyone (who remembers him at all – a diminishing cohort) thinks of his megahit from 1938, Cole Porter’s Begin the Beguine.  Or his other megahit from 1940-41, Frenesi.  Or maybe his Grammercy Five who put out classics like the under-appreciated Scuttlebutt from 1945, something featured in this space quite some time back.  And which I should listen to more frequently than I do.

In fact, if you are interested in a deeper Artie Shaw dive, listen to all four of these, each recording separated by no more than 3-5 years from what came before or after.  A traditional but smoother-than-common big band, a band with a full string section that refused to follow the normal rules, a hard driving, freewheeling small group session that pegs the fun meter from start to finish and this lush, sophisticated band that was copied by a generation of musicians who never forgot it (unlike Wikipedia’s editors, who seem to have never heard of it).

I suppose the one thing that binds them all together is their musical quality.  You can feel each one stretching for something, something that is probably not attainable.  But Artie Shaw always stretched for it anyway.  And we should all be glad that he did.  If only he had kept stretching during the second half of his life – think of all that might have been.


Further Reading: For a more in-depth look at this band, check out this 2012 Marc Myers piece found at the website for Canada’s Jazz.FM 

Music Credit:  So Easy, Artie Shaw & His Orchestra – from the YouTube page of Milton Page

Photo Credits:

Artie Shaw taken in New York in 1946-48 by William Gottlieb (and in the public domain by his wishes.)

Artie Shaw and the Rangers – taken March 5, 1943 for the Department of the Navy and in the public domain.

Example transcription disc from

Circa 1946 advertisement for Capitol Records Transcription Service as found offered for sale on Etsy.

1940 Victor Records album cover

Tadd Dameron, taken in New York in 1946-48 by William Gottlieb (and in the public domain by his wishes.)

Al Cohn album cover from the 1950 Savoy Records release Al Cohn’s Tones

19 thoughts on “Artie Shaw – So Easy. Except When It Isn’t

    • I find him a fascinating character, full of contradictions. He was a genuine star, with Ava Gardner and Lana Turner among his 8 wives. But someone who was also an artist at heart, dabbling at writing and painting at different times in his life. Another oddity was that he was so demanding in almost everything, but his players loved him because once they made the cut and got hired he gave them the freedom to do their thing.

      I had known a little about the transcriptions, but learned a lot myself in putting this together. The one thing I could not nail down was when these recordings were first released to the public. It would not surprise me if it was not until the 1970s or 80s.

      Liked by 1 person

  1. Great stuff, yes I can hear that coming from the Carson show. Never heard of transcription records either.

    Ugh, imagine being married 8 times? What a disaster..

    Liked by 1 person

    • From what I read, he would have been very difficult to live with. He was known for some really acerbic quotations. Like the time he said that Glenn Miller was a great guy – it would have been great if Glenn had lived and just his music had died. 🙂


  2. That was interesting JP. I have Begin the Beguine on my Big Band playlist, listened to it yesterday when I was walking in fact. He sounds like an interesting character, but 8 wives??? I’m wondering why he put down his clarinet and never picked it up again? I’m working on a music blog about those old records in the basement which I think are 78’s as they only have one song on each side. I read that I can’t play them on an ordinary record player (Sears combo with tape/cd option) as it can hurt the stylus? Also, any good websites which might tell me if any of them are worth anything? They do not look in good condition.

    Liked by 1 person

    • From what I understand a diamond stylus ought to be harder than one of those old shellac-coated records. The problem is that the modern diamond stylus is so much thinner and sharper than the old ones, which were made for a much wider groove. Which is why they could only get 15 minutes out of one side of a 16 inch disc playing at 33 1/3 rpm. I would bet you would see more damage to the records than to the stylus.

      On those old 78s condition is everything. The really old blues stuff of the 20s and such is valuable, but popular music from the big band era is really not, last I knew. As with most things, the more popular it was when new, the more of them are out there and the less valuable they are. There are lots of people selling those discs on eBay and such, so it should be easy to see some ballpark values. The reason so many are in so bad shape is because the old heavily weighted tone arms and steel needles that were common then would just grind those grooves to dust with heavy playing. Good luck – I love a good treasure hunt. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

    • Happy to be of service. I had thought of you and wondered if the era of the transcription discs was long over by the time you got into radio. I’ll bet the older stations still used them from time to time. I recall a couple of Fort Wayne AM stations that broadcast old radio shows in the 70s. Of course someone could have transferred the old discs to tape.


  3. Thanks for all that background! I like Artie Shaw’s music but didn’t know much about his history — especially the late 1940s. Most of my favorite music from that period is from the 1930s or early 1940s, so the Shaw music with which I’m familiar is probably from that time. Funny that I never thought much about his biography, though I know all about Glenn Miller and Benny Goodman.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yes, Shaw’s life was not the sort of thing that naturally translated to one of those biopics popular in the 1950s. A really good biography on Shaw was written maybe ten years ago and it was a great read. I also bought a set of CDs some years back in which the producers had worked with Shaw himself in curating the contents. That was where I first heard anything from this era. Those 1954 recordings were included there too and are really worth listening to.

      I don’t think he made many friends over his long life. But he was certainly always good for an opinion on something. He was featured prominently as one of the talking heads during Ken Burns’ docuseries on Jazz from a number of years back.

      Liked by 1 person

      • I don’t know anything about Shaw’s personality other than that he managed to date and/or marry a succession of beautiful movie stars (Ava Gardner, Rita Hayworth, et al). But sometimes, people who are intellectually or artistically interesting are hard to get along with after a while. Maybe that was the case with Shaw.

        Liked by 1 person

      • Benny Goodman is said to have said to Shaw that they had the clarinet as something in common. Shaw’s reply was something like “We’re nothing alike. You play the clarinet. I play music.”. He was one tart guy. 😁

        Liked by 1 person

  4. I am late to this particular party, but very glad I made it. And I must return to listen to the other links.

    Your deep dives into these musicians’ lives and works are a real treat. This one, with the discussions of Shaw’s complex personality and its impact on his career, was particularly interesting. The restless soul who created bands and then moved on, the artist who changed direction when he couldn’t meet his personal aspirations (not an unusual story), the acerbic personality who won devotion because he gave his musicians freedom: all those details enhanced this in-depth exploration.

    I know bloggers who won’t read anything longer than 500 words. They don’t realize what they’re missing.


  5. Pingback: Artie Shaw In Stereo – In 1939? | J. P.'s Blog

  6. Pingback: Charlie Ventura With The Gene Krupa Band – The Rise Of A Saxman | J. P.'s Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s